NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Highlighted in Zika Virus Collection

Supplemental Information

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Patricia P Garcez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Juliana Minardi Nascimento performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Janaina Mota de Vasconcelos performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rodrigo Madeiro da Costa performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rodrigo Delvecchio performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Pablo Trindade performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Erick Correia Loiola performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Luiza M. Higa performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Juliana Cassoli performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gabriela Vitória performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Patricia Sequeira performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jaroslaw Sochacki performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Renato S. Aguiar analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Hellen Thais Fuzii performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ana M. Bispo de Filippis performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

João Lídio da Silva Gonçalves Vianez Júnior performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Daniel Martins-de-Souza performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Amilcar Tanuri analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Stevens K Rehen conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All protocols and procedures were approved by the institutional research ethics committee of Hospital Copa D'Or (CEPCOPADOR) under approved protocol # 727.269.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The obtained genome from BR_ZIKV_AB_ES isolate was deposited in GenBank with accession number KX212103.

Funding

Funds (not specifically for Zika virus studies) were provided by the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES); Funding Authority for Studies and Projects (FINEP); National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq); Foundation for Research Support in the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ); the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grants 14/21035-0, 14/14881-1, 13/08711-3 and 14/10068-4); and fellowships from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
3 Citations   Views   Downloads