icon-show

Now Playing

The Paul Finebaum Show

FM Talk 1065

  • Mobile Mornings
  • Hear Dr. Bill Williams' Forecast

    twice an hour on FMTalk1065

Three Big Things

1 2 3
  • Supreme Court Appears Open to Some of Donald Trump’s Immunity Claims

    WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court, hearing a last-ditch appeal from Donald Trump, appeared open Thursday to granting some level of immunity to protect former presidents from being prosecuted for alleged crimes committed while in office.

    Over nearly three hours of oral argument, the court’s conservative majority expressed greater concern that a future president might flinch from bold action for fear of prosecution than the possibility that Trump might avoid accountability on charges he attempted to steal the 2020 presidential election from Joe Biden

    The risk, said Justice Brett Kavanaugh, was that a Trump trial could open the door to a new era of American politics where prosecution of ex-presidents became routine, much as the use of special counsels accelerated after the Watergate scandal. 

    Trump himself amplified that concern before arguments began Thursday. “Crooked Joe deserves life in prison!” Trump said in an email to supporters. “Put Biden on trial.”  

    The court seemed unlikely to embrace all of Trump’s arguments, which seek “absolute immunity” for alleged crimes committed while in office. But most justices agreed that former presidents deserve strong protection from prosecution.   

    Any high court decision embracing that position could further delay Trump’s trial, if not end the prosecution entirely. 

    Liberal justices, however, suggested the greater threat to democracy was a decision that effectively placed the president above the law, not one holding him to the same rules that apply to other high officials as well as ordinary Americans.  

    Telling “the most powerful person in the world” that there was no possibility of punishment for breaking the law, could turn “the Oval Office into the seat of criminal activity in this country,” said Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. 

    The Supreme Court’s decision is expected by the end of June.

    Trump wasn’t present to watch the high court in action. In New York, where he is on trial over state charges of falsifying business records, the judge declined to pause proceedings so the defendant could attend oral arguments in Washington.

     See more here: Supreme Court Appears Open to Some of Donald Trump’s Immunity Claims - WSJ

  • Prine to reject city's second settlement offer as saga continues

    Mobile Police Chief Paul Prine said in a statement he will reject a second settlement offer from the city. The settlement, which the administration gave him until Friday at noon, would’ve made him a consultant for MPD.

    Read the rest of the story here: Prine to reject city's second settlement offer as saga continues | News | lagniappemobile.com

  • US births fell last year, marking an end to the late pandemic rebound: experts

    U.S. births fell last year, resuming a long national slide.

    A little under 3.6 million babies were born in 2023, according to provisional statistics released Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That’s about 76,000 fewer than the year before and the lowest one-year tally since 1979.

    U.S. births were slipping for more than a decade before COVID-19 hit, then dropped 4% from 2019 to 2020. They ticked up for two straight years after that, an increase experts attributed, in part, to pregnancies that couples had put off amid the pandemic’s early days.

    Birth rates have long been falling for teenagers and younger women, but rising for women in their 30s and 40s — a reflection of women pursuing education and careers before trying to start families, experts say. But last year, birth rates fell for all women younger than 40, and were flat for women in their 40s.

    Rates fell across almost all racial and ethnic groups.

    There could be an adjustment to the 2023 data, but it won’t be enough to erase the “sizeable” decline seen in the provisional numbers, said the CDC’s Brady Hamilton, the new report’s first author.

    Experts have wondered how births might be affected by the June 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision that allowed states to ban or restrict abortion. Experts estimate that nearly half of pregnancies are unintended, so limits to abortion access could affect the number of births.

    The new report indicates that the decision didn’t lead to a national increase in births, but the researchers didn’t analyze birth trends in individual states or dissect data among all demographic groups.

    Surveys suggest many U.S. couples would prefer to have two or more kids but see housing, job security and the cost of child care as significant obstacles to having more children.

    READ MORE: US births fell last year, marking an end to the late pandemic rebound: experts (nypost.com)

M Mon Monday
T Tue Tuesday
W Wed Wednesday
T Thur Thursday
F Fri Friday
S Sat Saturday
S Sun Sunday
  • Got Junk

    The original targeted completion date for a new I-10 Mobile River Bridge and Bayway was 2028. When do you think the project will be completed?

  • Gulf Coast AutoTech
  • Weekdays with Gordon Deal
  • Tune In
  • Southern Cancer Center
  • Ben Murphy Roofing Company
  • Advertise With Us