There are times when
being a Christian makes me struggle to my core and today has been one of those
times.
In what would have
seemed the answer to many prayers a generation ago, representatives of the
Catholic Church and the Democratic Unionist Party met in Stormont, the seat of ‘Power’
in Northern Ireland and, amidst a plethora of smiles, came to an agreement. This
would have been dismissed as the stuff of fantasy a few years ago, but there
they were and united they stood.
So, why am I not
dusting down my tambourine and rejoicing? They were united in wishing to see a ‘conscience
clause’ inserted into Northern Ireland’s equality legislation, effectively allowing
an ‘out’ for those with ‘strongly held’ religious views. The catalyst was the
on-going battle over a ‘Christian’ bakery being taken to court for refusing to provide
a cake with a pro-gay marriage message. On the back of this, these Christians
who agree on very little else (do most DUP supporters even believe that
Catholics are Christians?) want religious opinion to trump equality. Such, it
seems, is the danger lurking in gay pastry that equality can go out the window
even if that means that some visionary can subsequently refuse to provide
services to a disability charity because he genuinely believes on ‘strongly
held’ religious grounds that disability is a punishment from God, or bad karma,
or a failure to say the Lord’s Prayer seventy five times a day or whatever other
nonsense might be covered by the expansive skirts of ‘religion’. This is only a
mild exaggeration: the author of the conscience clause has stated that it will
protect Christian photographers from having to take photos at a civil partnership
ceremony.
I believe in God, but I
am certain that refusing to provide ‘certain services’ to people because of
their sexuality (or their desire to celebrate it) has little to do with God. I am as committed as my fickle human nature
will allow to following (rather badly) the example and teaching of Jesus, but I
can’t equate that with the belief that refusing to bake a ‘gay cake’ is more
godly than treating everyone with generous degrees of love, respect and
equality.
….and don’t give me the
‘It’s not the people; it’s what they do that we object to’ line. That’s the
same as saying it’s alright to be a Christian as long as you don’t pray!
‘God is love’ is not a
woolly, fuzzy, feel-good, twenty-first century advertising slogan; believing it
is a demanding, costly invitation to being misunderstood, mistrusted and marginalised.
Believing it leads genuinely to empathising with others, to refusing to condemn
or discriminate, to seeing the image of God equally in everyone else. It leads
to the cross.
So, for what it’s
worth, I apologise to every LGBT person….and to everyone else hurt and abused
by narrow, bitter, sanctimonious religion. It’s enough to make God wish there
wasn’t a God!
Have you even read the conscience clause proposal? You are aware that it doesn't actually allow discrimination on the grounds of religious belief.
ReplyDelete'(3) After Regulation 16 insert—
ReplyDelete“Businesses: exception based on religious belief
16A
(1) This regulation applies to a person (“A”) whose sole or main purpose is commercial or anyone acting on his behalf or under his auspices.
(2) Nothing in these Regulations shall make it unlawful
(a) to restrict the provision of goods, facilities and services; or
(b) to restrict the use or disposal of premises,
so as to avoid endorsing, promoting or facilitating behaviour or beliefs which conflict with the strongly held religious convictions of A or, as the case may be, those holding the controlling interest in A.'
Albert Mansfield would you care to define my behaviour going about my daily business possibly with my boyfriend, or partner in tow?
ReplyDeleteWould us getting a house together count as facilitating?
Would us enjoying a romantic meal together in a restaurant count as endorsing?
What if I walking in wearing a pride t-shirt or Rainbow Flag Label Badge, would this count as endorsing?
Now can you say that is freedom of conscience amendment bill is not legalising discrimination?
Also if this is truly about religion conscience why is the only section of the equality act that this is being applied to the sexual orientation regulations.
I know some of faith object to divorcees, especially those that remarry, but they are not targetted. Some others of faith object to women in authority again they are not subject to these religious consciences. What about the adulteress that is married to the First Minister and leader of the party of the member bringing this bill?
Strange that religious conscience needs legislation only when it comes to LGBT people. That surely is discrimination by any definition.
I meant promoting from the t-shirt and badge comment above.
ReplyDelete